The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but also those um effects you're talking about tend to be just acute effects The Chronic effect can be a little bit of a reduction in testosterone but it is is one of the explanations for why exercise might increase a prostate cancer risk some of the studies are mixed on that well if it's driving testosterone levels but in the context of cancer treatment it would be very very small compared to what these powerful drugs do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.