The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the non- exerciser was almost identical to what you'd seen in the literature and what we've done a ton of time times where you have something like you're fairly mixed in terms of phenotype so you've got some percentage of fast swi some percent of his slow twitch but in fact he had about if I remember correctly something like 20% of his fibers are in what we call this hybrid format
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.