Peter Attia· MD
so you have to have some way to kind of normalize that um and in the case of the latter you know you would probably see a much higher met hour because of the intensity
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you have to have some way to kind of normalize that um and in the case of the latter you know you would probably see a much higher met hour because of the intensity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
do we want to say just the amount of distance you run a week tells us everything we need to know are two people who are running 15 miles per week experiencing the same metabolic uh benefit or harm well certainly not right one could be running them all at 10 minute mile pace one might be i mean just imagining this one might be running them all as 400 all-out repeats