The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'm looking at carbohydrate manipulation on resistance training and what I've noticed in my collection is I'm using squatting and so they do five sets of squats and I have them do the first three sets or ten reps the last two sets they are taking the set to failure so that's a lot longer than what somebody would usually be under load for and so now I think the conversation turns more to muscular endurance under that load versus just strength for a one rep max
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're doing resistance training it's actually you don't move the needle on your glycogen stores that much um your liver certainly but not not in your muscles you have to do several sets to failure with short rest periods to really you know um reduce glycogen stores in the muscle and even then you're only getting down to like 60 70 percent