The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then the third strategy is that collapse right um yes but if we're moving up the chain oh okay the third one that people will do is they'll simply fall forward they'll take they'll Bend forward at their hips they'll use forward momentum to carry them forward so now they're in your office with low back pain and it's it's coming it it's a direct reason because they cannot dorsy Flex their ankle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.