The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that is tissue tolerance right so it's very very easy to avoid with some some small amount of tissue tolerance which is basically a fancy way of saying like just expose the tissue to that demand slowly and increase that demand over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that that is tissue tolerance right so it's very very easy to avoid with some small amount of tissue tolerance which is basically a fancy way of saying like just expose the tissue to that demand slowly and increase that demand over time and it's going to be just fine