The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if they switched from um sunflower oil which is very high in linolic acid to olive oil they were actually significantly more likely to develop obesity over the course of the trial and so you know what was the odd ratio of that and that was statistically significant this is a secondary analysis of the pryed data we can put it on the screen on YouTube what was the I think the odds ratio was like 1.36 or something like yeah it was and it was statistically significant right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.