The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I don't know the answer I don't know the time course and but the important thing is to find the time course in humans so that we can really say for example I'm what I'm doing basically is I'm trying not to eat after dinner until like lunchtime the next day
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that auto Fuji is improved quite fast in fasting rodents we don't know the timeline for humans okay so we're trying to figure it out and by the way we can do with Anna Maria Cuervo we can take T lymphocytes and look at the auto Fuji on a time course in humans and they actually reflect also tough OG in the brain
It's an extremely interesting question that is easy to be answered in rodents, and difficult in humans. Because it may be easy to find a volunteer who fasts and allows for regular blood drawing, but it will be very difficult to find a volunteer who fasts and allows for liver, muscle, or skin biopsies.
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.