Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I had no way of knowing if my My fasting protocol of you know seven to ten days of water only once a quarter three days once a month was that too much was that too little was that doing anything was I mean no idea to this day I have no idea if that provided any benefit at all um I could certainly point to some negative things it did right it cost me probably 20 pounds of muscle over six years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I was very frustrated that as as much as I was trying to study this in myself and doing every part every sort of blood analysis Under the Sun I had no way of knowing if my My fasting protocol of you know 7 to 10 days of water only once a quarter 3 days once a month was that too much was that too little was that doing anything was I mean no idea to this day I have no idea if that provided any benefit at all
I could certainly point to some negative things it did right it cost me probably 20 lbs of muscle over 6 years but maybe that was a worthwhile trade-off given some other benefits but how would I know
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.