The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if I had for example some kind of autoimmune disease so let's take this disease rheumatoid arthritis that there's no evidence that fasting is gonna do anything for and dr. Longo says well you know you can reset your immune system if you do seven days of fasting what would I do I would absolutely need to it as opposed to taking a bunch of toxic drugs like prednisone like you've seen what prednisone does to people why wouldn't I do seven days of fasting the risk of that is zero
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what would I do I would absolutely need to it as opposed to taking a bunch of toxic drugs like prednisone like you've seen what prednisone does to people why wouldn't I do seven days of fasting
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.