Peter Attia· MD
jason has a very different approach to fasting than I do in my practice and I think that probably stems from the fact that I'm not treating patients who were nearly as sick as Jason
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
jason has a very different approach to fasting than I do in my practice and I think that probably stems from the fact that I'm not treating patients who were nearly as sick as Jason
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You're definitely more aggressive than I am because you're seeing much sicker patients I never lead off with water only fasting for patients usually what we do is we go we push the windows of time restriction which as I said a moment ago I'm not convinced there's huge benefit in time restriction
Time-restricted eating produces fat loss independent of total calories.
A 72-hour fast measurably improves autophagy markers in healthy adults.
One-meal-a-day (OMAD) eating patterns increase all-cause mortality in long-running cohort data.
Eating the largest meal before 3pm improves 24-hour glucose vs. an evening-heavy schedule, calorie-matched.