Peter Attia· MD
if we get one of those Nash scores and it comes back zero you're saying Peter you're not out of the woods yet there's a lot of nonsense that can be going on there
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if we get one of those Nash scores and it comes back zero you're saying Peter you're not out of the woods yet there's a lot of nonsense that can be going on there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I worry that if we're just relying ons and alts and Nash scores and things we're we're we're running a bit of a risk here