Peter Attia· MD
when you start to move into fat plus inflammation um so inflammatory cells infiltrating the liver um plus what we call hepy ballooning that stressed out hepatite that's the definition of Nash
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you start to move into fat plus inflammation um so inflammatory cells infiltrating the liver um plus what we call hepy ballooning that stressed out hepatite that's the definition of Nash
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we used to talk about naph and Nash I I assume that those were largely biopsy differentiated terms and Naf focused on fat accumulation Nash focused on the inflammation that was present uh and then of course therosis was the end stage of fibrosis