The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the choline story is interesting and I think if you look at it overly simplistic aliy you could say well it's a good guy and a bad guy but it seems to be more of a good guy than a bad guy huh yeah I think so I mean certainly from the perspective of fatty liver that's clear
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I assume that there's some absorption cap and the small intestine I have no idea what it is interesting so the choline story is interesting and I think if you look at it overly simplistic aliy you could say well it's a good guy and a bad guy but it seems to be more of a good guy than a bad guy