The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the idea that you know we should be doing scans on people you know again a fiber scan seems like a totally reasonable idea it's relatively low cost and if it gives us any insight even before you trigger that threshold that strikes me as far more useful than looking at something as anod asog hemoglobin A1c which is so prone to error
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.