The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um because it's a it's a general kneejerk assumption when someone sees hepatic steatosis so increased fat in the liver um to assume that it falls within what we used to call non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that we now call metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease without sort of doing the detailed work around alcohol
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.