The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we now know that fructose absorption at the level of the gut is inducible we learned this every Halloween because the kid eats a lot of sugar and then ends up having diarrhea like crazy because basically they malabsorption it they've got malabsorption because their enzyme hadn't been induced yet but if you continue to supply it the process increases
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.