The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we know in humans that you get fatty liver when you take the choline down and we know in animals that you get rid of fatty liver if you put the choline up then I would think that if you took the humans with the fatty liver and you put the choline up you get rid of it but for some reason that hasn't been tested the way you'd think it would be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and choline is such an overwhelming factor in the fat out part of the equation
if you take the person is eating right now and then you put them in a control lab environment and you take the choline out of their diet nine out of ten of them will develop fatty liver disease