The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we know that when you give rats or mice fructose they do much higher levels of De Nova lipogenesis which is the conversion of fructose into fats in the liver humans do that to a very very low extent there's really no evidence that fructose raises triglycerides in humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if that pathway out is going up then you know that if you've got fatty liver it's because more is coming in bottom line so the driver so you could say because triglycerides typically go up with naphthyl D that says it's not a problem of exporting it's not ineffective exporting