Peter Attia· MD
but uh in fact that didn't seem to actually remove p16 or p21 positive cells from any of the tissues that we evaluated so we're we're back at square one so we're still back what we have learned is that fettin doesn't do Jack
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but uh in fact that didn't seem to actually remove p16 or p21 positive cells from any of the tissues that we evaluated so we're we're back at square one so we're still back what we have learned is that fettin doesn't do Jack
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it had no beneficial effect whatsoever at the what's the mechanism of this Drug's action oh it has no action okay has no action or had no effect what is it supposed to supposed to kill C ccent cells or something okay um so we told this guy sorry it had no effect he said well let's prove that whether it had any change inessence cells so we gave him blind tissues from each of the treated and untreated mice and he tried a test and there were no changes in sessen cells by his marker he tried six different markers there were no changes and senescent cells
there's no evidence as far as I know that it either has an anti-aging effect or removes siness and cells