The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do think it's full of a lot of toxins as I've spoken about in the past but fish doesn't have any defense chemicals just like meat or chicken or pork but as I said earlier chicken and pork are often fed corn and soy they're monogastric animals they accumulate linoleic acid and their cell membranes and in their fatty tissues
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.