We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there is also a lot of discussion about fluoride and brain damage or i should say mental slowing in humans and if you look at that literature it's quite heterogeneous and the studies are not well conducted so i don't think we can make any accurate assessment about fluoride and drinking water and iq in humans the studies are all over the place again we can't say anything there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.