The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The effects of treatment with fluoride on bone mineral density and fracture risk meta-analysis they say here fluoride treatment increases spine and hip bone mineral density depending on the treatment duration and also on the dose overall there was no effect on hip or spine fracture risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in subgroup analyses a low fluoride dose are less than 20 milligrams per day of fluoride equivalence which is pretty low fluoride 20 milligrams a lot of fluoride if you if the oregon state university fluorides uh site says that four milligrams a day is the adequate intake 20 milligrams days are quite a big dose there was a significant reduction in fracture risk