The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's a decrease about 50% lose a level of function so if you were using a cane before you're using a walker if you using a walker before you're now in a wheelchair if you were walking normally you might be using a cane so there's a 50% people that go down a level in performance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a decrease about 50 percent lose a level of function so if you were using a cane before you're using a walker if you're using a walker before you're now in a wheelchair if you were walking normally you might be using a cane so there's a 50 of people right that go down a level in performance
50 of the people who don't die call it the 70 to 85% who don't die within a year 50% of them never regain their same function preall
what we don't talk a lot about is the 50 of the people who don't die call it the 70 to 85% who don't die within a year 50% of them never regain their same function preall in many ways I find that statistic even more uh profound
even if you don't die from a hip fracture, 50% of survivors never regain the same level of function.