The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think the another really big turning point is 65 plus um and and again we'll get to some of these things but we really start to notice um reduction in strength at about that age um we start to see vestibular changes that occur around that age and that probably contributes significantly to something we will talk about which is the risk of falling
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well I think if you're asking like why are there more Falls it's going to be lower limb weakness
why are there more Falls it's going to be lower limb weakness and we should double click on specifically like the role of the toe there um we had a recent podcast with uh Courtney Conley that discussed that um difficulty with walking and balance remember I said vestibular changes kick in around the age of 65 so all of us become less visually capable um and we have less just innate vestibular capacity uh the visual difficulties uh foot pain just poorly fitting Footwear as we age