The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this particular study followed the six- week training uh uh cycle that I just described with an 8we deconditioning period um and what's worth pointing out here is that the older group declined much faster than the younger group
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the older group declined much faster than the younger group so both groups were able to see significant gains but the older you were the quicker you lost those gains with inactivity