The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think it's all appetite and here's another issue okay so it is very interesting if you look at all these big jail lp1 studies cardiovascular what's the reduction in cardiovascular events almost uniformly 20% old dudes exenatide Etc log glutide new dudes 20% even though the weight loss with the newer ones is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what's the reduction in cardiovascular events almost uniformly 20% old dudes exenatide Etc log glutide new dudes 20% even though the weight loss with the newer ones is much greater much greater I I suspect in terms of cardiovascular benefit there is a cap