Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
oh I'm super interested in that question I I think we need to find that out it's it's they look good I think there's two parts though are they jerop protective from a caloric restriction effect or are there caloric independent effects that could potentially be asking the second question
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
uh and that is actually exactly the way I ended my discussion to these people I show them what resistance training did and if you could show what resistance training did uh with your muscle mass uh increase then you'd have something but you need to design the studies appropriately and as I said and as you said I I I don't know what the criteria are going to be that the FDA uses to judge these things they do have a sarcopenia set of criteria but that's a very different group of people that we're talking about but this comes uh and hits home to one of the things you asked me earlier what about the lean person who's 80 years of age is this the right drug for that person I don't know uh maybe not