The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whose efficacy is as you said profound and its safety at least in the short term unquestionable um you know are we going to basically see at the Olympics this year in France if they were drug testing for it what fraction of athletes would be taking glp1 agonists of the sports where body weight um regulation is a key
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
are we going to basically see at the Olympics this year in France if they were drug testing for it what fraction of athletes would be taking glp1 agonists of the sports where body weight uh regulation is a key I don't expect many shot cters to be taking it but I do wonder how many boxers and rowers and Runners and cyclists will be taking it