The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are three groups of people in bodybuilding today people that have emphatically adopted the use of gp1s group two are people that either use or don't use but don't say much about them either don't care don't know or they're using but they're kind of shush about it and then there's another group that is just absolutely viciously opposed to them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
are we seeing more bodybuilders now use glp1 agonists to yes yeah I was about to say right like why wouldn't you it would make it would make the most difficult part of bodybuilding easier which is the calorie restriction right
are we seeing more bodybuilders now use glp1 agonists to yes
obviously the majority of people using gp1 agonists and dual agonists Etc um are are not bodybuilders are not professional people whose livelihoods depends on their physique it's normal people