The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Sure. I think it all does. I mean I think all of this stuff has to be paid attention to and and I think the question again comes back to how much of that is occurring due to um due due to training, right? How much of that is happening due to the loss of amino acid intake and the loss of training
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Sure. I think it all does. I mean, I think all of this stuff has to be paid attention to and and I think the question again comes back to how much of that is occurring due to um due due to training, right? How much of that is happening due to the loss of amino acid intake and the loss of training