Paul Saladino· MD
unless those animals also had adequate glutathione levels if those animals quit glutathione levels that toxic effect was completely abolished
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
unless those animals also had adequate glutathione levels if those animals quit glutathione levels that toxic effect was completely abolished
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
all of the animals that they subjected to a diet that was depleted and the amino acids required for glutathione production every one of them got type 1 diabetes out of an injection of the acid basically