Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
Yeah, like >> I haven't seen the thermmore regulation stuff, but it seem so so it's unclear to me whether that's a cause or an effect, >> right? >> But but either way, does it matter if that's what you're taking it for? >> It's more of a GABA inhibi like more of that inhibitory.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.