Peter Attia· MD
by its very success it enables the use of chemicals in a higher concentration than you would be able to use them in the absence of GM and we'll use roundup or glyphosate as the poster child for that
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by its very success it enables the use of chemicals in a higher concentration than you would be able to use them in the absence of GM and we'll use roundup or glyphosate as the poster child for that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.