The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we started our shots at four weeks of age we did it in Snell dwarf mice which are more or less the same we started at four weeks and then 3 years later we had found that it had no effect whatever it took you know three years for the Bice to age it had no effect on life spin
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you start at two weeks it works when you start at four weeks at it doesn't okay