Peter Attia· MD
if they're using GH I'm sorry I misspoke if they're using GH I hope you're monitoring IGF levels
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if they're using GH I'm sorry I misspoke if they're using GH I hope you're monitoring IGF levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if they're using GH I'm sorry I misspoke if they're using GH I hope they're monitoring IGF levels
If you have GH at a certain level and it results in a certain amount of IGF-1, you will have negative feedback that will then lower your production of HGH while the IGF-1 is elevated. And as it declines, you have this decrease in inhibitory feedback that then tells your body, okay, now the IGF-1 is not present in significant quantities. It's okay to, you know, release GH again.
if you have GH at a certain level and it results in a certain amount of igf-1 you will have negative feedback that will then lower your production of HGH while the igf-1 is elevated and as it declines you have this decrease in inhibitory feedback that then tells your body okay now that igf-1 is not present in significant quantities it's okay to you know release GH again