The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So um I think there's some accepted medical use for GH in burn victims for example, right? So um if a person s sustains a significant enough burn um enough of their body surface area is burnt. I mean that's one of the most catabolic activities the human can sustain and therefore the reversal of that is one of the most anabolic demands that a human can sustain as an adult.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so um I think there's some accepted medical use for GH in burn victims for example right so um if a person sustains a significant enough burn um enough of their body surface area is burnt I mean that's one of the most catabolic activities the human can sustain and therefore the reversal of that is one of the most anabolic demands that a human can sustain as an adult