Peter Attia· MD
But with GH, anecdotally, it seems to be quite effective in rehabilitation. I think that it is worthwhile in an acute time frame. Like that's where the ROI makes sense in my opinion.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But with GH, anecdotally, it seems to be quite effective in rehabilitation. I think that it is worthwhile in an acute time frame. Like that's where the ROI makes sense in my opinion.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and with GH and anecdotally it seems to be quite effective in Rehabilitation I think that it is worthwhile in an acute time frame like that's where the ROI makes sense in my opinion
with GH anecdotally it seems to be quite effective in Rehabilitation I think that it is worthwhile in an acute time frame