The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and my understanding of the literature here is that um like you said it's not clear that there are significant benefits particularly for strength i think i think there's some evidence that muscle mass may increase but but strength doesn't but it's also not clear that there's any real detriments right that there's any significant risk which is a little bit surprising
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.