Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
you can have people who are on an allplant diet who are metabolically healthy and presumably eating a 100 grams or more of fiber a day plenty of food and you can have somebody on a you know a a Paleo paleo is also a pretty high plant diet but like you could be on a carnivore diet and I've seen people on these who are very metabolically healthy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I I trying to think about any studies that really kind of got at the heart of of this I mean really the study that you would want to do is you want to take one of these individuals you know measure their microbiome and you'd want to put them on a series of different diets and just sort of see like is this something that is not changeable like no matter what you eat or what diet you're on you know this particular strain stays stays high in which case you would argue that the microbiome is a readout of their metabolic Health not the cause of their metabolic Health could be