The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so we just did a little pilot study ourselves of you know we gave we said go on this product for 90 days and you know do this kind of diagnostic test on cravings and um was it a blinded study was there a placebo arm no so this is a pilot this is just a proof of concept um and so what we see is that um people have a significant reduction in these food cravings and so what that's now being parlayed into is funding a clinical trial to look at that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.