The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then the third part is because they're also mutating you need to understand what did the functions change so if you really want to understand the microbiome I mean we were spending you know5 to $6,000 per sample to understand longitudinally what's happening what are the different functions how are these things changing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we are super interested in carbohydrate metabolism and so we look at the output of that as the short chain fatty acids so berate propionate acetate
I think it's important that we don't lose sight of what actually matters it's what clearly matters when we look at our cells um I think we're really understanding that today in in in humans that function matters more than genome so it's you know the protein is more important than the gene — what do we look at in the gut biome are you looking at secretory products