The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think i'm right in saying for c diff uh they haven't really seen big differences based on the route of administration in terms of the advocacy when it's been studied with colonoscopy probably as opposed to comparing comparing the efficacy of oral fmt versus uh enema versus nasal gastric
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think i'm right in saying for c diff uh they haven't really seen big differences based on the route of administration in terms of the advocacy when it's been studied with colonoscopy probably as opposed to comparing comparing the efficacy of oral fmt versus uh enema versus nasal gastric okay um so kind of looking at you know the efficacy and cure rates for c diff i think they've seen pretty comparable for the different routes of administration