Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So you're talking about measuring your fecal bacteria population using uBiome? Yeah. UBiome or there are others, like Rocky Mountain blah, blah, blah doctors data, whatever it was. Okay. There are other ones. Yeah.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you're talking about measuring your fecal bacteria population using uBiome? Yeah. UBiome or there are others, like Rocky Mountain blah, blah, blah doctors data, whatever it was. Okay. There are other ones. Yeah.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.