The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you mentioned a couple of these are things like um what are some examples salmonella e coli um citrobacter uh clostridium difficile a lot a lot of these um sorry clostridium difficiles is uh incorrect that's not proteobacteria but a lot of these pathogens right staphylococcus streptococcus that are normally present in a healthy gut but at a very very low abundance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.