The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
personally I think that we're looking at the wrong gut microbiome I think most of the things are happening in the small intestine in us and that set of microbiome is yet we haven't been able to characterize well yet I think we will eventually but just having somebody send something into you biome or one of the other groups biome that's kind of the end product and that as you and I probably would both agree shifts on a daily basis depending on what we're eating
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.