The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it really this longitudinal data really matters and then additionally because every microbe is replicating at a different rate the um the the Constitution or the the fraction in which one microbe might be in your gut today might be different tomorrow and so you you need longitudinal data that get you the quantitative piece plus you know who are the players
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.