The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think this is the I think that's that emotional bucket that is the hardest one for us in our practice to help patients with right because one we don't have a great set of screening tools we have really good screening tools for these other ones
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so for example when it comes to identifying type two or type three let's use the physical one we have so many ways that we assess people for movement and strength and balance and stability and stamina and all of these things