The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The data shows less microabbrasions. And also, what I really >> and sorry, if you're not concerned with sexually transmitted diseases, which is what the WHO is concerned with, if you're with one partner and only one partner, are microabbrasions a problem? >> They lead to pain. And once we get into a pain signaling process, you can get this is a common cause of what we call vaginismas or a tightening of the pelvic floor which then leads to more pain.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.