The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
women get older that we haven't really talked about this that um you do need more stimulation with age even if you don't have any pathology so if you don't have diabetes or vascular many women need more stimulation with age because the sensitivity goes down and so I I really normalize the use of of vibratory stimulation because it helps a lot right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but sometimes it also helps for younger women so like do this is is less the case sometimes for young women because they don't need quite as much stimulation
I really normalize the use of of vibratory stimulation because it helps a lot right but sometimes it also helps for younger women